Medicine and the Limits of Science with Michel Accad, MD


Michel Accad, Cardiologist, Blogger

Chapters:

0:00 Medicine more a subset of ethics than a continuum of science

8:37 Licensing is a disservice to medicine

11:14 The genome is a body part

13:42 The most nagging question in healthcare today

19:37 Boorse’s definition of health

22:58 “Simon says. . .” has become “Science says . . .”

Are drug prices really too high? If so, how do we bring them down? Is precision medicine and the use of molecular profiles really making a difference in healthcare today?

These are questions that regularly haunt our industry and the journalists who cover it. But there will be no answers until we face the grand question of all, what today's guest calls the most nagging question in medicine: What is health?

Today we begin a new series focused on just this question.

When I came across Michel Accad’s recent blog, Why I Don’t Believe in Science, of course it provoked me to click. Either he would be a terrible nutcase, in which case I'd lose the time it takes to discover this, or it might turn out to be one of those disturbing points of the day when we have to actually do some thinking. What I found was a cardiologist based in San Francisco who was doing some deep philosophical thinking about medicine today. And, obviously, one savvy enough to get some click through. It turns out Michel does believe in science, but he doesn’t share the pervasive view that medicine is a continuum of science.

What are his thoughts about precision medicine? What is his definition of health?

We always jump at the chance to have a medical doctor on the program, and a doctor who is also a philosopher is a double treat. Today's interview takes us down a different path than our typical shows, and we'd like to invite the audience to send us your feedback by clicking here.



New to Mendelspod?

We advance life science research, connecting people and ideas.
Register here to receive our newsletter.

or skip signup